Opisense

Solution · Opinote add-on

Opinion joins the dialogue—not after it.

Opinion is an optional layer on Opinote that listens through speech-to-text, text-to-speech, and speech-to-speech paths so teams get live signals while context is still fresh: alignment with past agreements, emerging risk, financial inconsistency, missing voices, and organisational memory—instead of discovering the gap in tomorrow's summary.

Organisations purchase Opinion as an add-on to Opinote. It inherits the same meeting policies, classifications, and Workspace entitlements as your capture layer.

In developmentNot launched yet

Opinion is currently being developed. We plan to launch before Q4 2026.

Interactive previews

Memory that shows up while work still moves

Two moments where Opinion earns its seat: inside an Opimeet session—where live transcript and governed cues converge—and on Opiapp, where the same institutional memory interrupts duplicate paths before two teams ship conflicting conclusions.

workspace.opisense.com/opimeet

Each tab loops three independent chapters—green insight, amber overlap, then red breach—each with status, correction, reporting, and follow-up before the next colour begins. Mobile follows the same rhythm.

Signed disclosures versus hallway reframes

Live session

Audit committee review · FY25 close

Recording
SpeakingCommittee chair

CB

Workspace participant

Connected
SpeakingCFO

AR

Workspace participant

Connected
SpeakingGeneral counsel

LM

Workspace participant

Connected
SpeakingOpinote capture

On

Workspace participant

Connected

Decisions (draft)

  • Keep external messaging aligned to AC-2025-08; route changes through Legal/IR workflows.
  • If narrative changes are needed, reconvene a closed committee slice before analyst briefings.
  • Attach clarifications to the filing record so public statements remain attributable.

Opinote chat

Team messages · Opinion signals here too

Draft
Ask in the meeting…

Opiapp · same memory, different surfaces

Interrupt duplicate effort before it ships

Each phone runs three separate loops—Opinion status, then Opinote correction, reporting, and follow-up—before returning to the first. Two independent timers (programme faster; disclosure slower).

09:41

Opiapp · Priorities

···

Illustrative Workspace behaviour; policies and audiences are yours to configure.

Programme desk · duplicate artefact intercepted
07:54

Opiapp · Disclosure desk

···

Illustrative Workspace behaviour; policies and audiences are yours to configure.

IR desk · filing posture conflict surfaced early

Signals you govern—not surprises

Administrators define sensitivity, audiences, and tone. Opinion watches for patterns worth interrupting gently or firmly, according to policy.

Already settled elsewhere

Themes that match recorded decisions or policy surface so the room can acknowledge precedent instead of redoing work.

Safety and duty of care

Language or proposals that imply elevated operational or people risk trigger signals aligned with your safety and compliance posture.

Financial inconsistency

Figures, commitments, or scenarios that conflict with budgets, models, or prior financial conclusions surface before signatures land.

Missing stakeholder voice

When required owners or perspectives have not been heard, Opinion flags the gap while invitees are still present.

Contradiction with institutional memory

Discussion that conflicts with documented agreements, contracts, or executive direction is highlighted with citations teams can verify.

How Opinion shows up

Choose how assertive signals are: whisper-quiet nudges for hosts only, transcript badges everyone sees, or spoken synthesis through Opinote channels—within policies you set.

Spoken and audible cues

For approved meetings, Opinion can use text-to-speech or speech-to-speech so facilitators hear guidance without reading side panels.

Transcript-native signals

Anchored highlights appear beside live speech-to-text so remote participants notice drift without disruptive audio.

Policy-bound escalation

Sensitive sessions stay subtle: signals route only to designated roles or remain transcript-only until the chair acknowledges.

Evaluation, decisions, and memory—live

Opinion reinforces why executive teams run meetings: clear choices and accountable memory—not theatre summarised the next day.

Sharper evaluation

Criteria, trade-offs, and dissent surface while participants can still respond—not buried in a recap nobody trusts.

Explicit decisions and owners

Emerging commitments get named and attributed live so “we agreed” matches what the recording reflects.

Living organisational memory

Past boards, programmes, and policies inform today's dialogue through governed retrieval—not anecdotes.

Governance first

Signals serve the chair—not the algorithm

Opinion inherits Workspace classification, retention, and audit norms. It logs what was surfaced, under which policy, and keeps accountability with people.

Scoped visibility

Who sees a signal follows role-aware rules so HR, customer, or board context never leaks to the wrong audience.

Replayable signal history

Signals tie back to timestamps and policy versions—useful for regulated environments and post-incident review.

Human gate for voice output

Spoken interventions respect explicit allowances so sensitive forums stay quiet until facilitators opt in.

Same fabric as Opinote

Structured artefacts and routing stay on Opinote paths you already approved—Opinion adds live steering, not a parallel inbox.

Runs on Opimeet and Opinote

Opinion does not replace your meeting platform or capture layer. It extends Opinote with proactive participation inside Opimeet-backed conversations, packaged as an additional purchase when organisations want live steering alongside structured outputs.

Let's find the right solution for you

Start with the pilot program and see real usage — then finalize scope and commercials with our team.